Mitsubishi Delicia
Registered in 2005.
What fails its inspection
Great Britain's MOT record for the 2005 2.8 diesel. 5 of 11 tests failed.
| Where | Share of failures | Failed tests |
|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 80% | 4 |
| Brakes | 60% | 3 |
| Lights and electrics | 60% | 3 |
| Steering | 40% | 2 |
| Visibility | 40% | 2 |
| Body and structure | 20% | 1 |
The defects inspectors cite
- An obligatory rear fog lamp missing, or a front or rear fog lamp inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning
- Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc
- Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
- A brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm
- A shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage
- A suspension component excessively damaged or corroded
Before you buy one
Built from what this car fails on, not from general knowledge of the model.
- Suspension — 80% of its failures
- A shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage
- A suspension component excessively damaged or corroded
- A suspension component insecurely attached to chassis or axle
- Brakes — 60% of its failures
- A brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm
- Steering — 40% of its failures
- Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc
- Lights and electrics — 60% of its failures
- An obligatory rear fog lamp missing, or a front or rear fog lamp inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning
- Visibility — 40% of its failures
- Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
- Body and structure — 20% of its failures
- A suspension component excessively damaged or corroded
- A suspension component insecurely attached to chassis or axle