Peugeot 308
Registered from 2007 to 2026.
About this model
The Peugeot 308 is a small family car (C-segment) produced by French automobile manufacturer Peugeot. It was unveiled in June 2007, and launched in September 2007 in hatchback form, which was followed by station wagon in March 2008, coupé cabriolet in February 2009, and a saloon/sedan version in February 2010. The 308 replaced the 307, and is positioned below the 508 and above the 208.
From the Wikipedia article Peugeot 308, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
What fails its inspection
Great Britain's MOT record for the 2013 1.6 diesel. 3,104 of 12,535 tests failed, 25%.
Better than 18% of 2013 cars. The typical one fails 19%, across 828 models with enough tests behind them to say.
| Where | Share of failures | Failed tests |
|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 45% | 1,385 |
| Lights and electrics | 37% | 1,156 |
| Brakes | 28% | 871 |
| Tyres and wheels | 25% | 767 |
| Body and structure | 22% | 681 |
| Visibility | 15% | 467 |
The defects inspectors cite
- A spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened
- A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc
- A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn
- The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements
- Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
- Stop lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning
Before you buy one
Built from what this car fails on, not from general knowledge of the model.
- Suspension — 45% of its failures
- A spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened
- A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn
- Brakes — 28% of its failures
- A brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm
- Tyres and wheels — 25% of its failures
- Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
- Lights and electrics — 37% of its failures
- Stop lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning
- Body and structure — 22% of its failures
- Visibility — 15% of its failures
- Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen
When it starts failing
At 200k+ miles this one fails 38% of its inspections, against the 24% an ordinary car of the same age fails.
| Odometer | Failure rate | Rate | Its age | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–20k miles | 13% | 8% | 67 | |
| 20–40k miles | 16% | 12% | 592 | |
| 40–60k miles | 21% | 16% | 1,903 | |
| 60–80k miles | 24% | 20% | 3,157 | |
| 80–100k miles | 26% | 22% | 3,110 | |
| 100–120k miles | 26% | 24% | 1,872 | |
| 120–140k miles | 27% | 24% | 968 | |
| 140–160k miles | 29% | 24% | 423 | |
| 160–180k miles | 30% | 24% | 190 | |
| 180–200k miles | 32% | 24% | 117 | |
| 200k+ miles | 38% | 24% | 125 |
12,524 British inspections, grouped by the odometer reading recorded at the test.
Half of these have more than 80k miles on them. That is how far people drive this car, not how long it lasts.
Specification
| Year | Measured |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 1.5 diesel · 129 hp · 1393 kg · 2730 mm wheelbase · 4.6 L/100km (WLTP) |
| 2020 | 1.2 petrol · 1278 kg · 2620 mm wheelbase · 5.3 L/100km (WLTP) |
| 2019 | 1.2 petrol · 1210 kg · 2620 mm wheelbase · 5.6 L/100km (WLTP) |
| 2018 | 1.2 petrol · 1164 kg · 2620 mm wheelbase · 5.9 L/100km (WLTP) |
| 2017 | 1.6 diesel · 115 hp · 1356 kg · 2730 mm wheelbase · 3.8 L/100km (NEDC) |
| 2016 | 1.6 diesel · 109 hp · 1361 kg · 2664 mm wheelbase · 3.6 L/100km (NEDC) |
| 2015 | 1.6 diesel · 110 hp · 1308 kg · 2668 mm wheelbase · 3.6 L/100km (NEDC) |
| 2014 | 1.6 diesel · 105 hp · 1336 kg · 2657 mm wheelbase · 3.9 L/100km (NEDC) |
| 2013 | 1.6 diesel · 105 hp · 1458 kg · 2649 mm wheelbase · 4.2 L/100km (NEDC) |
| 2012 | 1.6 diesel · 105 hp · 1484 kg · 2655 mm wheelbase · 4.5 L/100km (NEDC) |
| 2011 | 1.6 diesel · 103 hp · 1474 kg · 2613 mm wheelbase · 4.6 L/100km (NEDC) |
| 2010 | 1.6 diesel · 1462 kg · 2629 mm wheelbase · 4.7 L/100km (NEDC) |
Recalls
Filed by the manufacturer with a regulator. A recall is repaired free of charge, whoever owns the car now.
A11/0006/16
The doors may unlock and open when moving which could lead to impaired driving.
Recall of the product from end users
A11/00077/23
The lubrication of the vacuum pump may be insufficient and this can cause it to break, which in turn can lead to reduced braking assistance, creating a risk of an accident. The product does not comply with the Regulation on the approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles.
Recall of the product from end users
A12/00405/22
The thread on the housing of the towing eye has the wrong dimensions and the eye cannot be screwed the required 7 to 8 turns. When towed, the vehicle can get disconnected from the vehicle towing it, posing a risk to the following traffic. The product does not comply with the Regulation on the approval and market surveillance of Motor Vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles.
Recall of the product from end users
A12/00592/23
Incorrect torque on various mechanical and electrical connections may lead to loss of control of the vehicle or propulsion failure, increasing the risk of an accident or fire. The product does not comply with the Regulation on the approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles.
Recall of the product from end users
A12/01184/21
The teeth of the timing belt may wear off prematurely due to excessive dynamic tension in dusty conditions. As a result, the engine may stall at high engine speeds and not being able to restart, increasing the risk of an accident. The product does not meet the requirements laid down in the Regulation on the approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles.
Recall of the product from end users
A12/01422/22
The external door handles do not close the doors properly. There is a risk of doors opening while driving, increasing the risk of an accident. The product does not comply with the Regulation on the approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles.
Recall of the product from end users
A12/01621/23
The safety function of the charging cable may fail and not prevent the cable from overheating, creating a risk of fire. The product does not comply with the Regulation on the approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles.
Recall of the product from end users
A12/01870/23
A software error in the engine control unit prevents the malfunction indicator light (MIL) from switching on if the urea injector stops working. This can lead to higher emissions and poses a risk to the environment. The product does not comply with the Regulation on the approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles.
Recall of the product from end users
17 more campaigns have been filed against this model. A dealer can check by VIN which apply to one car.