Toyota Proace
Registered from 2013 to 2026.
About this model
The Citroën Jumpy is a light commercial van jointly developed by FCA Italy and PSA Group and, since 2021, Stellantis. The Jumpy is also sold as the Peugeot Expert, Fiat Scudo, Opel Vivaro, and Toyota ProAce. They were previously built by Sevel, a joint venture created in 1994 by the two companies.
From the Wikipedia article Citroën Jumpy, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.
What fails its inspection
Great Britain's MOT record for the 2018 1.6 diesel. 254 of 1,598 tests failed, 16%.
Better than 9% of 2018 cars. The typical one fails 10%, across 966 models with enough tests behind them to say.
| Where | Share of failures | Failed tests |
|---|---|---|
| Lights and electrics | 41% | 105 |
| Brakes | 35% | 88 |
| Tyres and wheels | 31% | 80 |
| Visibility | 16% | 40 |
| Suspension | 11% | 29 |
| Body and structure | 9% | 24 |
The defects inspectors cite
- A brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm
- A headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of LED
- A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps
- A tyre seriously damaged
- Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
- A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning
Where it stands out against its peers
- Lights and electrics: failed more often than 94% of 2018 cars — 41% of its 254 failed tests, where an ordinary 2018 car has 15%.
Same model year only, at least 30 peer cars, zeros included. Every car has a worst part; this shows which, and how far from ordinary it is. A high share means more to check, not a verdict.
NHTSA's investigations are American; no European regulator publishes an equivalent record, so this section has nothing to draw on for a European car. There is no European equivalent of the service-bulletin register either.
Before you buy one
Built from what this car fails on, not from general knowledge of the model.
- Brakes — 35% of its failures
- A brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm
- Brake pedal anti-slip provision missing, loose or worn smooth
- Tyres and wheels — 31% of its failures
- A tyre seriously damaged
- Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
- Suspension — 11% of its failures
- Lights and electrics — 41% of its failures
- A headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of LED
- A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps
- A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning
- Visibility — 16% of its failures
- Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
- Body and structure — 9% of its failures
When it starts failing
At 120–140k miles this one fails 16% of its inspections, about what an ordinary car of the same age does.
| Odometer | Failure rate | Rate | Its age | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–20k miles | 10% | 6% | 41 | |
| 20–40k miles | 11% | 9% | 210 | |
| 40–60k miles | 15% | 12% | 423 | |
| 60–80k miles | 17% | 14% | 414 | |
| 80–100k miles | 18% | 15% | 286 | |
| 100–120k miles | 19% | 15% | 124 | |
| 120–140k miles | 16% | 16% | 68 |
1,566 British inspections, grouped by the odometer reading recorded at the test.
Half of these have more than 60k miles on them. That is how far people drive this car, not how long it lasts.
Specification
| Year | Measured |
|---|---|
| 2022 | 2.0 diesel · 142 hp · 1797 kg · 3275 mm wheelbase · 7.2 L/100km (WLTP) |
| 2021 | 2.0 diesel · 157 hp · 1875 kg · 3274 mm wheelbase · 7.2 L/100km (WLTP) |
| 2020 | 1.5 diesel · 117 hp · 1733 kg · 2961 mm wheelbase · 6.4 L/100km (WLTP) |
| 2019 | 2.0 diesel · 160 hp · 1882 kg · 3046 mm wheelbase · 7.3 L/100km (WLTP) |
| 2018 | 1.6 diesel · 113 hp · 1664 kg · 2925 mm wheelbase · 5.2 L/100km (NEDC) |
| 2017 | 1.6 diesel · 118 hp · 1660 kg · 3176 mm wheelbase · 5.2 L/100km (NEDC) |
Recalls
Filed by the manufacturer with a regulator. A recall is repaired free of charge, whoever owns the car now.
A12/00010/19
The rear brake tube is not tightly connected to the holding clip on the lower suspension arm.As a result, it may become damaged and leak brake fluid, reducing the braking performance of the vehicle and increasing the risk of accident.The shaft of the parking brake might have been incorrectly manufactured.As a result, the parking brake might not properly function and the vehicle might unintentionally move, increasing the risk of accident.The fuel tube can move against the ribs of the urea tank.As a result, it may become damaged and leak fuel, which might get ignited, increasing the risk of fire.An insufficient torque might have been applied to the seat belt fixation, seat belt anchor and ground cable bolts.As a result, the seat belt fixation and anchor might become loose, increasing the risk of injuries in the event of an accident or the ground cable might overheat, increasing the risk of fire.The mastic in the front left and right wheel arch panels might been applied incorrectly. As a result, water could filter and reach the airbag module, increasing the risk of accident or injuries in the event of an accident.
Recall of the product from end users
A12/0017/19
The tightening torque of the threaded connection between the ball joint and knuckle may decrease and the A/C compressor pulley could break. If this occurs, the pulley will separate into 2 components that will rotate against each other, generating heat. The bolts holding the front and rear suspension arm to the chassis could be deformed and break and the steering rack fixation might be damaged. The ball joint might detach from the knuckle. The heat generated at the AC compressor pulley may damage surrounding parts. The front suspension arm and the rear arm could detach from the chassis during driving. Moreover, the steering rack might detach during driving.
Recall of the product from end users
A12/0019/14
The vehicles concerned may have been fitted with incorrect brake discs which do not comply with the mechanical resistance characteristics necessary for this model. If the incorrect brake discs are fitted the braking efficiency could be reduced, or, in the worst case, a brake disc could fracture under heavy loads.
Recall of the product from end users
A12/0020/14
An internal defect in the wiper motor could create a malfunction of the front wiper system. In the worst case, the wiper may suddenly stop during operation. If this occurs, driver visibility could be reduced under rainy conditions.
Recall of the product from end users
A12/00327/22
Due to an incorrectly fixed cable, the rear window defogger may not work properly, which in turn can could reduce visibility and could lead to road accidents. The product does not comply with the requirements laid down in the Regulation on the approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles.
Recall of the product from end users
A12/00448/20
Several fixations on the rear axle component might not have been tightened correctly and can come loose. If this occurs, the vehicle might become difficult to control or brake fluid might leak, leading to braking performance reduction. —
Recall of the product from end users
A12/00755/22
One or both cushions of the two-person front row seat might not be locked to the backrests. As a consequence, the head restraint may become completely detached from the seat backrest, increasing the risk of injury to the occupants in the event of a sudden stop or accident. The product does not comply with the Regulation on the approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles.
Recall of the product from end users
A12/01147/22
The rear brake caliper may have been assembled incorrectly during production, which can lead to the braking functions not working properly. As a result, during parking the vehicle may move unintentionally, or while driving the braking force may not be fully released from the wheel, increasing the risk of an accident. The product does not comply with the Regulation on the approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles.
Recall of the product from end users
17 more campaigns have been filed against this model. A dealer can check by VIN which apply to one car.